About Atisbo

Atisbo is one list of what to do next, written by what your customers and your team say. Tickets, calls and messages arrive as they happen, get grouped when they describe the same underlying problem as something already on the list, and get ranked by how much evidence backs them and how urgent they sound — and the evidence stays attached through the response, the review and the measured outcome. The product manager chooses what to build; your team and its coding agents work from the same list, so the trail from what people said to what got shipped is never rebuilt by hand every time work changes hands.

It is built for product teams that already get real work out of Claude Code, Codex or Cursor, that are measured on whether what they shipped changed something, and that treat the quality of a decision as the work itself. It is a poor fit for teams measured on shipping volume, where nobody owns product decisions, or that do not work with agents at all — an MCP-capable agent is part of the profile Atisbo is built for, not an optional accessory.

Atisbo does not replace a team's tracker. Jira, Linear and GitHub stay the delivery surfaces for tasks, commits and pull requests; Atisbo owns the product problem, the priority, the decision and the outcome, and a coding agent holding both at once turns a decision into an instruction rather than a synchronisation feature.

Every connection Atisbo makes to a team's other tools is read-only, enforced in code. Nothing a customer connects is used to train any model. Both commitments are detailed on the trust and security page, alongside how workspace isolation works at the database level.